QPPV.COM KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT

GVP Module VII: PSUR Inspection Findings and Common Deficiencies — Knowledge Assessment

Test your understanding of the concepts covered by GVP Module VII: PSUR Inspection Findings and Common Deficiencies.

Question 1 of 10Pass mark: 80%

Question 1 of 10 A vendor prepares a major PSUR analysis. Which statement best reflects the MAH's responsibility?

The vendor assumes regulatory responsibility for the analysis The MAH remains responsible and should control qualification, specifications, QC, traceability and review The MAH only needs to verify the vendor's invoice Vendor-generated outputs do not need to be reconciled with internal data

Question 2 of 10 Which feature most clearly distinguishes justified continuity from problematic copy-forward in a PSUR?

Use of the same document template Retention of conclusions that have been reassessed against new evidence Repetition of previous wording without reviewing new evidence Reuse of tables that contain unchanged historical data

Question 3 of 10 An existing important risk is listed in the PSUR, but the report does not assess whether new evidence changed its severity, frequency or management. What deficiency does this represent?

Adequate cumulative evaluation because the risk was mentioned Failure to meaningfully reassess the current status of an important risk A submission-control deficiency only An acceptable approach when the risk was known before the reporting interval

Question 4 of 10 A risk-minimisation measure was distributed to healthcare professionals, but no evidence of behavioural or clinical impact is available. What is the most accurate interpretation?

Distribution proves effectiveness Implementation evidence demonstrates delivery, but effectiveness requires separate assessment of whether the measure achieved its intended purpose The measure should automatically be considered ineffective Effectiveness is relevant only to routine risk minimisation

Question 5 of 10 Which evidence chain most closely reflects a mature PSUR inspection-ready system?

Final report, submission receipt and employee recollections Regulatory obligation, scope and DLP, source data, analysis, scientific assessment, QC, approval, submission, regulatory assessment and follow-up Previous PSUR, current template and management dashboard Vendor report, signed approval page and archived email

Question 6 of 10 A recurring reconciliation failure is addressed by adding another final review step. What is the key concern with this CAPA?

Additional review steps are never permitted It may address the symptom without identifying whether the root cause is a system, interface, ownership or data-design problem Reconciliation issues cannot be managed through CAPA CAPA should focus only on individual employee retraining

Question 7 of 10 Why is exposure characterisation important when interpreting PSUR safety data?

Exposure estimates are needed only for financial planning Without understanding the exposed population, rates, trends and comparisons may be misleading Exposure can be omitted whenever spontaneous reports are available Precise exposure must always be claimed even when it cannot be established

Question 8 of 10 What should the QPPV reasonably be able to do regarding a significant PSUR conclusion?

Personally perform every underlying data extraction Explain the major issue, uncertainties, process adequacy and resulting actions sufficiently to exercise oversight Approve the conclusion without reviewing supporting evidence Delegate all accountability to the report author

Question 9 of 10 Which question is most useful for testing the traceability of an important PSUR statement?

Was the statement written in the preferred corporate style? Can the organisation show where it came from, why it was interpreted that way, who challenged it and what happened because of it? Was the statement copied from the previous PSUR? Was the statement approved before the report was formatted?

Question 10 of 10 Which pattern most strongly suggests that a previous CAPA was ineffective?

A single typographical error corrected before submission A recurring deficiency appearing across successive PSUR cycles A change in report authorship with documented handover A justified difference between two extracts that was reconciled

GVP Module VII: PSUR Inspection Findings and Common Deficiencies — Knowledge Assessment

Cookie Settings