QPPV.COM KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT

PSMF Annexes Governance and Inspection Readiness Assessment

Test your understanding of the concepts covered by PSMF Annexes Guide.

Question 1 of 10Pass mark: 80%

Question 1 of 10 Which responsibility is most appropriately assigned to PV Quality or Compliance in the annex governance model?

Maintaining all day-to-day product and vendor entries personally Conducting periodic independent verification, audit sampling and assurance reporting Approving commercial product launch decisions Replacing IT as the owner of system validation activities

Question 2 of 10 Which CAPA record would provide the strongest evidence that a corrective action was effectively closed?

A status marked 'complete' with no supporting documentation A planned action, owner and due date without an effectiveness assessment A documented root cause, completed deliverables and verification evidence showing the action was effective A CAPA number copied into the audit report without any follow-up record

Question 3 of 10 Why should a time-stamped PDF inspection copy be created when an inspection request is received?

To ensure inspectors receive an official representation of the annexes as they existed at that inspection point To prevent the organisation from updating any annex thereafter To replace the electronic audit trail in the document-management system To allow editors to modify the inspection version without approval

Question 4 of 10 A governance forum observes several overdue annex reviews, repeated CAPAs with similar root causes and multiple stale vendor entries. What is the most appropriate interpretation?

These are isolated administrative issues with no relevance to PV governance The pattern may indicate weaknesses in control effectiveness and should be risk-assessed and escalated as appropriate The issues should be hidden from senior management until all CAPAs are closed The solution is to remove review due dates from the annex metadata

Question 5 of 10 Which annex would be most useful for identifying appropriate interviewees and checking whether reporting lines support declared PV responsibilities?

Organisational structure annex Inspection history annex Product inventory annex Audit programme annex

Question 6 of 10 What is the main purpose of retaining previous annex versions in an accessible archive?

To permit uncontrolled use of obsolete information To demonstrate the historical state of the PV system and provide a traceable change history To replace the current controlled version To avoid documenting the reason for changes

Question 7 of 10 What is the principal functional relationship between the main body of the PSMF and its annexes?

The main body describes how the PV system is designed and operates, while annexes provide dynamic operational evidence and detail The main body contains only historical information, while annexes contain all current regulatory requirements The main body is used for inspections, while annexes are maintained solely for internal training The main body contains product-specific data, while annexes describe the organisation's quality system

Question 8 of 10 An organisation reviews its vendor inventory only annually, despite frequent additions and changes to critical service providers. What is the most appropriate improvement?

Retain annual review because all annexes should have the same cadence Introduce a more frequent review and event-triggered updates proportionate to vendor activity and risk Stop documenting vendor changes until the next inspection Remove criticality classifications to simplify maintenance

Question 9 of 10 A company has outsourced literature screening to a service provider but the provider is absent from the vendor inventory. What is the most important immediate concern?

The company may be unable to demonstrate complete oversight of an outsourced PV activity The PSMF main body must be rewritten before any further action The service provider automatically becomes the MAH The literature screening activity no longer requires validation

Question 10 of 10 A QPPV leaves the organisation unexpectedly and a replacement has not yet completed the normal document-change process. What approach is most consistent with the described policy?

Wait until the next annual review before updating the annex Delete the QPPV annex until a permanent replacement is appointed Create a clearly identified interim update with expedited approval and complete formal change control within the defined timeframe Allow each affiliate to maintain a different unofficial version

PSMF Annexes Governance and Inspection Readiness Assessment

Cookie Settings